AngelList prices a roll-up vehicle as a subscription add-on

The record

AngelList's own startup-pricing data, archived 8 October 2024, shows a Roll Up Vehicle offered not as a standalone flat fee but bundled into a subscription-tier comparison table: an add-on on the Starter ($1,600 a year) and Growth ($3,200 a year) tiers, one standard RUV per year included on the Growth Plus tier ($5,600 a year), and custom pricing on the top Scale tier. AngelList's own RUV product page, archived the same window, describes the vehicle as holding up to 250 investors in a single line on a company's cap table, with AngelList forming the entity, drafting investment documents, automating signature collection, and handling KYC and accreditation.

What the sources establish

The pricing data distinguishes what is bundled from what is separately billed: the Growth Plus tier includes one RUV a year at no incremental fee, while a company on a lower tier, or wanting a second RUV, pays as an add-on, and the largest issuers negotiate directly. The Roll Up Vehicles product page, retrieved on 16 September 2026 and describing itself as powered by AngelList, restates the structural pitch — one line on the cap table, K-1s issued to RUV investors, support for both SAFEs and priced equity rounds — without itself stating a price, consistent with pricing living on AngelList's own subscription pages.

Scope and revision

This record describes AngelList's fund-administration pricing as its own site stated it in an October 2024 snapshot, not a current live quote; a founder should re-check the live pricing page before budgeting, since AngelList itself notes prices exclude applicable state taxes and that larger accounts receive custom terms outside the published tiers. The page's own claim that startups using RUVs have collectively saved over $40 million is AngelList's unaudited estimate of aggregate savings across its customer base, not a verified third-party figure, and should be labelled as such if it is repeated.

The decision in front of you

A founder deciding whether a RUV or a traditional SPV-per-investor structure fits a raise should compare AngelList's bundled subscription cost against the administrative cost of running many separate small checks by hand, using AngelList's own tier table as the starting price reference. This is editorial framing based on the published tiers, not a recommendation of AngelList over any alternative provider.

• Does the relevant subscription tier already include a free RUV, or would this raise need a paid add-on?
• How many investors does the raise expect, relative to the 250-investor line AngelList states for a single RUV?
• Is the $40 million savings figure being cited as AngelList's own unaudited claim, or restated as an independent finding?

AngelList prices RUV access the way a software company prices a feature, bundled into a tier, rather than as a single transaction fee, and that structure is worth reading before assuming a flat per-deal cost.